Power & Politics

The "Peace-Dealing" of Those Who Have Abandoned Ukraine: As Trump Pressures Kyiv to Replace Its Elected President, He Pumps Blood into the Russian Treasury

The Trump administration's so-called "peace-dealing" is in reality a demand that Ukraine unilaterally disarm before the aggressor: publicly pressuring Kyiv to replace its elected leaders, while lifting sanctions on Russian diesel exports to fuel the war machine. When Moscow then followed up by striking a Zaporizhzhia residential building with glide bombs, killing 20 people, this coordination has gone beyond policy missteps and amounts to de facto favoritism toward the aggressor — and the cost of

0 viewsSign in to save
TRUTH ERA

The Trump administration is telling the world, in the most brazen terms, that its so-called "facilitation of peace" amounts to nothing more than demanding that Ukraine unilaterally disarm before the aggressor. According to a Deutsche Welle report, last Saturday Trump stated publicly at the White House that Ukraine should change its leader, saying verbatim, "I suggest they pick a leader who can get a [peace] deal done," and that Zelensky "for some reason … has never been able to do that."

This is not diplomatic pressure — it is open interference in the democratic process of a sovereign nation. The remarks came just hours after the United States had reached an agreement with Russia to lift sanctions on Russian diesel exports.

The lethality of that agreement lies not on paper, but on the battlefield. Even as Kremlin special economic representative Kirill Dmitriev echoed the line on X, declaring that "President Trump has also joined those leaders who believe Ukraine needs a real focus on peace, not Zelensky's belligerence," Russian glide bombs were already on their way to Zaporizhzhia. That same day, Zelensky wrote on X: "Today, Russia struck a residential building in Zaporizhzhia with five glide bombs, to thank the United States for lifting sanctions on Russian diesel exports."

This is the true mechanism of the U.S. "peace-dealing" policy: lift sanctions → the Russian treasury fills up → Moscow gains new leverage at the negotiating table and on the battlefield → the United States then pressures Ukraine to stop striking Russian refineries, so as not to disrupt U.S. diesel prices. At the White House, Trump warned Zelensky that "he had better stop right now," and blamed Zelensky for high U.S. diesel prices, saying "He wants to create trouble for the entire world. He wants to create trouble for our farmers, our ranchers, with diesel fuel."

Every move serves the same logic: shift the cost of the war's continuation onto Ukraine's sovereignty, its civilians, and its front lines, while replenishing the aggressor's resources. As Deutsche Welle noted, Trump's remarks came on the heels of Friday's announcement of the U.S.-Russia diesel deal, with European allies "still digesting the news after being stunned by it."

Even more devastating is the manipulation of the numbers. Trump claimed Zelensky "has lost 30% of his country, with over two million people killed," yet independent estimates put the territory actually controlled by Russia at roughly 20%; British defense officials have previously stated that Russian military deaths number around 500,000, and there are currently no reliable up-to-date estimates of Ukrainian fatalities. This is not a slip of the tongue — it is a politicized narrative: exaggerating Ukraine's "losses" to provide emotional ballast for the call to "replace the leader," while rewriting the war story from "Russian aggression" to "Ukrainian incompetence."

The deeper motivation lies in U.S. domestic politics. According to Deutsche Welle, Trump has for weeks been trying to blame fuel price increases on Ukraine — increases that stem from his own confrontation with Iran, not from any action by Kyiv — and has repeatedly attacked Zelensky as the midterm elections approach. When a decision can bring down diesel prices for American voters while buying the Moscow war machine another breath, the White House has not hesitated to turn the steering wheel toward Moscow.

This is not a diplomatic disagreement. When a nuclear power openly demands that another country replace its elected leader, while rewarding with lifted sanctions the very aggressor that is butchering civilians with glide bombs, it has crossed the line beyond policy misstep and constitutes de facto favoritism toward the aggressor. The broken glass beneath the Zaporizhzhia residential building, the 20 lives extinguished — these are the immediate bill for that favoritism. And the name on that bill is Kyiv's and that of Ukrainian civilians, not Washington's.

Comments

0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.