Power & Politics

Trump Administration Proposes Excluding Non-Citizens from Census, Reshaping Logic Behind Congressional Apportionment and Federal Resource Allocation

The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a proposal to exclude temporary legal status holders and undocumented immigrants from the decennial census used for apportioning congressional seats, counting only citizens and lawful permanent residents. The proposal would break with the historical precedent established by the 1790 Census Act of counting all persons with a "usual place of residence" in the United States, affect the formulas that distribute more than $2.8 trillion in federal funds using

0 viewsSign in to save
TRUTH ERA

The U.S. Department of Commerce on Wednesday released a proposal to exclude non-citizens, including those with temporary legal status and undocumented immigrants, from the decennial census used for apportioning congressional seats, counting only U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. According to Al Jazeera, the proposal argues that undocumented immigrants and other foreign nationals lacking sufficiently durable legal status should not be tallied, on the grounds that they are not "genuine residents" and lack sufficient "ties and allegiance" to the United States.

The move would break with the historical precedent established by the 1790 Census Act, which directed government workers to count all persons with a "usual place of residence" in the United States, regardless of citizenship status. Census data serve a wide range of purposes, determining not only the apportionment of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives but also the formulas used to distribute federal aid funding. The U.S. Census Bureau has reported that census data for fiscal year 2021 were used to distribute more than $2.8 trillion in federal funds.

The proposal also recommends streamlining the questions on race and ethnicity in the questionnaire, citing "significant doubts" about the "meaning, function, and impact" of such categories and questioning their continued "usefulness." The proposal asserts that reducing related questions would help lower the response burden, thereby boosting census participation rates and ensuring "more equitable political representation."

The proposal also seeks to add a question about legal immigration status to the questionnaire and plans to verify citizenship information by cross-checking it against databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the tax system. Providing false information on a census questionnaire is itself a federal crime. Critics warn that the citizenship-related question could be used to advance Trump's mass deportation drive, which he has pledged would be the largest in U.S. history.

Trump attempted during his first term to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, but the Supreme Court in 2019 blocked the effort, ruling that the administration's stated justification "appears to have been contrived." The new proposal attempts to circumvent that legal obstacle by redefining who is to be counted through an administrative rule.

William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, told Al Jazeera: "The administration is trying to change who counts as an American." Frey warned that even if the proposal is ultimately not implemented, it could still produce a broader chilling effect on census participation. "That's the scary thing," Frey said, "the administration has been trying to discourage certain groups from fully participating in government. So even if these proposals don't come to fruition, the damage has already been done."

Notably, the U.S. Department of Justice on September 2 warned states that they could lose billions of dollars in welfare funding if they failed to report known undocumented immigrants to the federal government. Together with the census proposal, this threat forms part of a systematic push by the Trump administration to tighten immigrant political participation. The census proposal is just one piece of that push, moving in tandem with congressional redistricting and restrictions on mail-in voting.

The proposal remains far from final implementation and could face legal challenges and administrative resistance; questions also remain over the practical feasibility of cross-checking citizenship information against databases at the Department of Homeland Security and the Treasury Department. But if participation rates decline as a result of a chilling effect, the accuracy of census data would be the first casualty, in turn distorting calculations of resource distribution for communities and putting the federal funding share of immigrant-heavy states at risk of contraction.

Comments

0

No comments yet. Start the discussion.